Early hearning screening by otoacoustic emissions and auditory brain stem response in nabeul
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
Background: Hearing loss is the most common congenital abnormality with a reported prevalence of 1 to 3 ‰ live births. Early detection and intervention is critical to prevent the adverse consequences of a delayed diagnosis on speech language and cognitive development.
aim: study the frequency of deafness in the newborns and the infants under 6 months followed in Tlatli Hospital in Nabeul and to search for correlations with risk factors identified by the Joint Committee on Infant Screening.
methods : 397 children aged between 04 days and 5 months with deafness risks are tested on two-stage strategy of evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAE) and auditory brain stem response (ABR).
results: EOAE test is positif in 9,32 % of cases (37 children) and the ABR test is positif at 7 of these ; that is 1,76 % of cases. Significant statistic correlations were found with the antecedent of bacterial meningitis (p=0,001) and trisomy 21 (p=0,018). Unfortunately 40 % of the children were lost to follow-up.
Conclusion: EOAE with ABR provide an excellent procosis screening technique of hearing loss. Such screening implies however the creation of networks to assure patient follow up.
aim: study the frequency of deafness in the newborns and the infants under 6 months followed in Tlatli Hospital in Nabeul and to search for correlations with risk factors identified by the Joint Committee on Infant Screening.
methods : 397 children aged between 04 days and 5 months with deafness risks are tested on two-stage strategy of evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAE) and auditory brain stem response (ABR).
results: EOAE test is positif in 9,32 % of cases (37 children) and the ABR test is positif at 7 of these ; that is 1,76 % of cases. Significant statistic correlations were found with the antecedent of bacterial meningitis (p=0,001) and trisomy 21 (p=0,018). Unfortunately 40 % of the children were lost to follow-up.
Conclusion: EOAE with ABR provide an excellent procosis screening technique of hearing loss. Such screening implies however the creation of networks to assure patient follow up.
Keywords:
Hearing loss, otoacoustic emissions, risk factors, new born.##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
References
- Thompson DC, MC Phillips H, Davis Robert L, Lieu TA, Homer CJ, Helfand M. Universal Newborn Hearing Screening. Jama 2001 ; 286:2000- 10.
- JakubikoVa J, Kabatova Z, Pavlovcinovar G, Profant M. Newborn hearing screening and strategy for early detection of hearing loss in infants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 73: 607-12.
- De Capua B, Costantini D, Martufi C, Latini G, Gentile M, De Felice C. Universal neonatal heaaring screening : the siena (Italy) experience on 19700 newborns. Early hum Develop 2007 ; 83 : 601-6.
- Kemp DT. Otoacoustic emissions, their origin in cochlear function and use. British Med Bull 2002; 63 : 236-41.
- Ayache S, Kolski C, Stramandinoli E, Leke A, Krim G, Strunski V. Dépistage de la surdité néonatale par la technique des otoémissions acoustiques provoquées. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 2001 ; 118: 89- 94.
- Habib HS, Abdelghaffar H. Neonatal hearing screening with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in western Saudi Arabia. Int Pediatr otorhinolaryngol 2005 ; 69 : 839-42.
- Nelson HD, Bougatsos C, Nygren P. Universal newborn hearing screening : systematic review to update the 2001 US preventive services task force. Pediatrics 2008;122 :e266-76.
- Johnson JL, White KR, Widen JE et al. A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission /automated autitory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol : introduction and overview of the study. Am J Audio 2005, 14 : S178-85.
- Johnson JL, White KR, Widen JE et al. A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stages otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem reponse newborn hearing screening protocol. Pediatrics 2005,116 : 663 - 72.
- Ohl C, Dornier L, Czajka, chobaut JC, Tevernier L. Newborn hearing screening on infants at risk. Int.J.Pediatr otorhinolaryngol 2009 ; 73 : 1691 - 5.
- Kirkim G, Serbetcioglu B, Erdag T.K, Ceryan K. The frequency of audiotory neuropathy detected by universal newborn hearing screening program. Int.J Pediatr otorhinolaryngol 2008 ; 72 : 1461-9.
- Roth DA, Hildesheimer M, Maayan - Mezger A et al.Low prevalence of hearing impairment among very low birth weight infants as detected by universal neonatal hearing screening. Arch Dis child 2006 ; 91 : F 257 - 2 .
- Biernath KR, Montero DP, Mehl A, Toomey K. Universal newborn hearing screening and beyond. Am Fam physician 2010 ; 81 : 124 - 6.
- Moulin A, Ferber -Viart C, Berland M, Dubrevil C, Duclaux R. Dépistage systématique de la surdité en maternité par oto-émissions accoustiques provoquées : aspects pratiques et attitudes parentales .Arch Pediatr 2001 ; 8 : 929 - 36.
- Mom T. Les otoémissions en pratique clinique et chirurgicale . Ann otolaryngol Chir cervicofac 2007 ; 124 : 80 - 9.
- Van Den Abbeele T, Noel - Petroff N, Viala P, Frachet B, Narcy P. L'implant cochléaire induit une maturation des voies auditives chez l'enfant sourd congénital. Ann otolaryngol chir cervicofac 2002 ; 119 : 105 - 6.
- US preventive services task force. Universal Screening for hearing loss in newborns: recommendation statement. Pediatrics 2008; 122 : 143-8.
- Agence nationale d'accréditation et d'évaluation en santé. Evaluation clinique et économique du dépistage néonatal de la surdité permanente par les otoémissions acoustiques. Rapport, 1999.
- Le Driant B, Vandrome L, Kolski C, Strunski V. Dépistage de la surdité néonatale permanente : quelles conséquences sur la mise en place des interactions précoces mère-bébé. Neuropsy Enf adol 2006 ; 54 : 315 -20.