Prevalence of Specific learning disorders in a Cohort of children with school failure

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Feb 11, 2015
Download
pdf
Vol. 92 No. 8 (2014): Issue Aug 2014

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Sonia Missaoui
Naoufel Gaddour
Lotfi Gaha

Abstract

Background : Specific learning disorders (SLD) are poorly known and studied in Tunisia. A National research project on their prevalence was launched recently. Aim of this study was to estimate prevalence of SLD in a cohort of children with school failure.

Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study with a population of 287 First and Third grade Primary School students, screened by their teachers as facing learning problems through a systematic screening process based on achievement and behavior. Multidisciplinary assessment consisted in general medical examination, child psychiatry, child neurology, speech therapy and psychology (cognitive). 180 students have been assessed.

Results : Prevalence of SLD over study population was 32%, which gives a general population prevalence 6.4%. Most common SLDs were dyslexia and dyscalculia. Most of children with SLD came from disadvantaged social groups.

Conclusion : Despite methodological limitations, this first study on SLD sheds some light on their prevalence in Tunisian students, and opens perspectives for future more focused studies and interventions for their management in Tunisia.

Keywords:

School failure, Specific learning disorders, dyslexia, dysorthographia, dyscalculia, prevalence

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. OMS. Valable à partir de l'URL: www.who.int /whr/2001/en/ whr01_ch2_fr .pdf
  2. Vaivre-Douret L. Troubles d'apprentissage non verbal : les dyspraxies développementales. Arch Pédiatr 2007 ; 14 : 1341-1349
  3. Cuvellier J.C , Pandit F., Casalis S., et al. Analyse d'une population de 100 enfants adressés pour troubles d'apprentissage scolaire. Arch Pédiatr 2004 ; 11 : 201-206
  4. Morgon A, Aimard P. Dyslexie-dysorthographie de l'enfant. J Pédiatr Puériculture 1989 ; 5 : 279-28.
  5. American Psychiatric Association, 2000. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. (DSM-IV), text revision. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC
  6. Echenne B. Dyslexie-dysorthographie : définition, bases neurologiques et physiopathologiques. Arch Pédiatr 2002 ; 9 (Suppl 2) : 262-4
  7. Nguyen The Tich S. Centres de référence des troubles d'apprentissage scolaire : effets et conséquences. Arch Pédiatr 2005 ; 12 : 897-9.
  8. Leroy D. Un nouveau regard sur la dyslexie dysorthographie. Plaidoyer pour une reconnaissance précoce de ce handicap. Arch Pédiatr 1998 ; 5: 1383-6
  9. Giannitelli M, Plaza M, Guillemont F. et al. Troubles du langage oral et écrit chez des jeunes pris en charge par l'aide sociale à l'enfance et bénéficiant de soins hospitaliers. Neuropsychiatr Enfance Adolesc 2011; 59 : 492-500
  10. Mille C, Daroux JL, Tissot B. Dyscalculies. J Pédiatr Puériculture 1995 ; 1 : 21-7
  11. Billard C, Delteil-Pinton F. Clinique de la dyslexie. Arch Pédiatr 2010 ; 17 : 1734-4
  12. Blanc J.P. Troubles des apprentissages : état des lieux et Propositions. J Pédiatr Puériculture 2008 ; 21 : 176-8