Epidemiologic Study of Hyperopia in Schoolchildren in Tunisia
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
Aim: To study the epidemiological profile and the degree of severity of hyperopia in Tunisia primary school and to assess its effect on school performance.
Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive survey was conducted among 6-14 aged Tunisian children attending primary urban and rural schools. A total of 6192 children were selected using stratified random cluster sampling. Cycloplegic refractive error was measured among all children with uncorrected visual acuity less than 9/10 or signs of astheniopia. Hyperopia was defined as spherical equivalent (SE) 2.0 diopters (D). We have also searched a possible relation between degree of severity of hyperopia and school performance.
Results: The prevalence of hyperopia was 2.61%. The spherical equivalent mean was + 3.73 ± 0.94 D. The mean age was 9.67 ± 0.44 years. This prevalence was 2.77% in boys and 2.47% in girls. 3.13% of students were living in urban areas and 1.42% in rural areas. The hyperopia rate decreased significantly with age (p = 0.021), but it was not significantly related to gender (p=0.54). The difference in the prevalence of hyperopia between urban and rural areas was not statistically significant (p = 0.067). There was no significant association between the degree of severity of hyperopia and school performance (p=0.41).
Conclusion: In our study, the prevalence of hyperopia among schoolage children in Tunisia was 2.61%.The identification of this refractive error and its correction as soon as possible would ensure these children better visual comfort and a better education.
Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive survey was conducted among 6-14 aged Tunisian children attending primary urban and rural schools. A total of 6192 children were selected using stratified random cluster sampling. Cycloplegic refractive error was measured among all children with uncorrected visual acuity less than 9/10 or signs of astheniopia. Hyperopia was defined as spherical equivalent (SE) 2.0 diopters (D). We have also searched a possible relation between degree of severity of hyperopia and school performance.
Results: The prevalence of hyperopia was 2.61%. The spherical equivalent mean was + 3.73 ± 0.94 D. The mean age was 9.67 ± 0.44 years. This prevalence was 2.77% in boys and 2.47% in girls. 3.13% of students were living in urban areas and 1.42% in rural areas. The hyperopia rate decreased significantly with age (p = 0.021), but it was not significantly related to gender (p=0.54). The difference in the prevalence of hyperopia between urban and rural areas was not statistically significant (p = 0.067). There was no significant association between the degree of severity of hyperopia and school performance (p=0.41).
Conclusion: In our study, the prevalence of hyperopia among schoolage children in Tunisia was 2.61%.The identification of this refractive error and its correction as soon as possible would ensure these children better visual comfort and a better education.
Keywords:
Hyperopia; schoolchildren; Tunisia; prevalence; refractive error##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
References
- Naidoo KS, Jaggernath J. Uncorrected refractive errors. Indian J Ophthalmol 2012;60:432-7
- Negrel AD, Maul E, Pokharel GP, Zhao J, Ellwein LB. Refractive Error Study in Children: Sampling and Measurement Methods for a MultiCountry Survey. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:421-6
- Maul E, Barroso S, Munoz SR, Sperduto RD, Ellwein LB. Refractive error study in children: results from La Florida, Chile. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:445-54
- Pokharel GP, Negrel AD, Munoz SR, Ellwein LB. Refractive error study in children: results from Mechi Zone, Nepal. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:436-44
- Zhao J, Pan X, Sui R, Munoz SR, Sperduto RD, Ellwein LB. Refractive error study in children: results from Shunyi District, China. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;134:735-43
- Rotsos T, Grigoriou D, Kokkolaki A, Manios N. A comparison of manifest refractions, cycloplegic refractions and retinoscopy on the RMA-3000 autorefractometer in children aged 3 to 15 years. Clin Ophthalmol 2009;3:429-31
- Choong YF, Chen AH, Goh PP. A comparison of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in primary school children. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:68-74
- Berman M, Nelson P, Caden B. Objective refraction: comparison of retinoscopy and automated techniques. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1984;61:204-9
- Williams C, Lumb R, Harvey I, Sparrow JM. Screening for refractive errors with the Topcon PR2000 Pediatric Refractometer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:1031-7
- Fotedar R, Rochtchina E, Morgan I, Wang J, Mitchell P, Rose KA. Necessity of Cycloplegia for Assessing Refractive Error in 12-Year-Old Children: A Population- Based Study. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;144:307-9
- Zhao J, Mao J, Luo R, Li F, Pokharel GP, Ellwein LB. Accuracy of noncycloplegic autorefraction in school-age children in China. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:49-5
- Dandona R, Dandona L, Srinivas M, Sahare P, Narsaiah S, Muñoz SR, et al. Refractive error in children in a rural population in India. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:615-22
- Fotouhi A, Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Mohammad K. The prevalence of refractive errors among schoolchildren in Dezful, Iran. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:287-92
- Anera RG, Soler M, De la Cruz Cardona J, Salas C, Ortiz C. Prevalence of refractive errors in school-age children in Morocco. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2009;37:191-6
- Goh PP, Abqariyah Y, Pokharel GP, Ellwein LB. Refractive Error and Visual Impairment in School-Age Children in Gombak District, Malaysia. Ophthalmology 2005;112:678- 85
- Rezvan F, Khabazkhoob M, Fotouhi A, Hashemi H, Ostadimoghaddam H, Heravian J, et al. Prevalence of refractive errors among school children in Northeastern Iran. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2012;32:25-30
- Hashemi H, Fotouhi A, Mohammad K. The age- and gender-specific prevalences of refractive errors in Tehran: the Tehran Eye Study. Ophthalmic Epidemiology 2004;11:213-25
- Murthy GV, Gupta SK, Ellwein LB, Muñoz SR, Pokharel GP, Sanga L, et al. Refractive Error in Children in an Urban Population in New Delhi. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:623-31.
- Czepita D, Mojsa A, Zejmo M. Prevalence of myopia and hyperopia among urban and rural schoolchildren in Poland. Ann Acad Med Stetin 2008;54:17-21.
- Padhye AS, Khandekar R, Dharmadhikari S, Dole K, Gogate P, Deshpande M. Prevalence of Uncorrected Refractive Error and Other Eye Problems Among Urban and Rural School Children. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2009;16:69-74
- Dirani M, Zhang X, Goh LK, Young TL, Lee P, Saw SM. The role of vision in academic school performance. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2010;17:18-24
- Flax N. The contribution of visual problems to learning disability. J Am Optom Assoc 1970;41:841-5
- Flax N. The eye and learning disabilities. J Am Optom Assoc 1972;49:454-5
- Fan DS, Lam DS, Lam RF, Lau JT, Chong KS, Cheung EY, et al. Prevalence, Incidence, and Progression of Myopia of School Children in Hong Kong. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:1071-5.
- Naidoo KS, Raghunandan A, Mashige KP, Govender P, Holden BA, Pokharel GP, et al. Refractive Error and Visual Impairment in African Children in South Africa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:3764-70.
- He M, Zeng J, Liu Y, Xu J, Pokharel GP, Ellwein LB. Refractive Error and Visual Impairment in Urban Children in Southern China. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:793-9
- Yekta A, Fotouhi A, Hashemi H, Dehghani C, Ostadimoghaddam H, Heravian J, et al. Prevalence of refractive errors among schoolchildren in Shiraz, Iran. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2010;38:242-8.