laparoscopy for perfored duodenal ulcer : conversion and morbidity factors: Retrospective study of 290 cases
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
Background: feasibility and advantages of laparoscopic approach in performed duodenal ulcer have no longer to be demonstrated. Laparoscopic suture and peritoneal cleaning expose to a conversion rate between 10 and 23%. However less than laparotomy, morbidity of this approach is not absent.
Aim: This study aim to analyze factors exposing to conversion after laparoscopic approach of perforred duodenal ulcer. We also aim to define the morbidity of this approach and predictive factors of this morbidity Methods: Retrospective descriptive study was conducted referring all cases of perforated duodenal ulcer treated laparoscopically over a period of ten years, running from January 2000 to December 2010. All patients were operated by laparoscopy with or without conversion. We have noted conversion factors. A statistical analysis with logistic regression was performed whenever we have sought to identify independent risk factors for conversion verified as statistically significant in univariante. The significance level was set at 5%. Analytic univariant and multivariant study was performed to analyze morbidity factors.
Results: 290 patients were included. The median age was 34ans.T he intervention was conducted completely laparoscopically in 91.4% of cases. The conversion rate was 8.6%. It was selected as a risk factor for conversion: age> 32 years, a known ulcer, progressive pain, renal function failure, a difficult peritoneal lavage and having a chronic ulcer. Postoperative morbidity was 5.1%. Three independent risk factors of surgical complications were selected: renal failure, age> 45 years, and a chronic ulcer appearance.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic treatment of perforred duodenal ulcer expose to a conversion risk. Morbidity is certainly less than laparotomy and a better Knowledge of predictif’s morbidity factors become necessary for a better management of this disease
Aim: This study aim to analyze factors exposing to conversion after laparoscopic approach of perforred duodenal ulcer. We also aim to define the morbidity of this approach and predictive factors of this morbidity Methods: Retrospective descriptive study was conducted referring all cases of perforated duodenal ulcer treated laparoscopically over a period of ten years, running from January 2000 to December 2010. All patients were operated by laparoscopy with or without conversion. We have noted conversion factors. A statistical analysis with logistic regression was performed whenever we have sought to identify independent risk factors for conversion verified as statistically significant in univariante. The significance level was set at 5%. Analytic univariant and multivariant study was performed to analyze morbidity factors.
Results: 290 patients were included. The median age was 34ans.T he intervention was conducted completely laparoscopically in 91.4% of cases. The conversion rate was 8.6%. It was selected as a risk factor for conversion: age> 32 years, a known ulcer, progressive pain, renal function failure, a difficult peritoneal lavage and having a chronic ulcer. Postoperative morbidity was 5.1%. Three independent risk factors of surgical complications were selected: renal failure, age> 45 years, and a chronic ulcer appearance.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic treatment of perforred duodenal ulcer expose to a conversion risk. Morbidity is certainly less than laparotomy and a better Knowledge of predictif’s morbidity factors become necessary for a better management of this disease
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
References
- Siu WT, Leong HT, Law BK, Chau CH, Li AC, Fung KH et al. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2002 ; 235: 313-9.
- Rodriguez-Sanjuan JC, Fernandez SR, Garcia RA, Trugeda S, Seco I, F la de Torre, Naranjo A, Gomez F. Perforated peptic ulcer treated by simple closure and Helicobac-ter Pylori eradication. World J Surg 2005 ; 29 : 849-52.
- Lunevicius R, Morkevicius M. Risk factors influencing the early outcome results after laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer and their predictive value. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2005:390:413-420
- Arfa.M.N, Gharbi.L, Manai.S, Ben Abid.S, Ben Nejma.et al. Traitement de l'ulcère duodénal perforé par simple suture laparoscopique et éradication de l'hélicobacter pylori. Le journal de Coelio-chirurgie 2004 ;51:35-39
- Kafih M., Fekak H., Elidrissi A., Zeouali N. Ulcère duodenal perforé: Traitement cÅ“lioscopique de la perforation et de la maladie ulcéreuse. Ann. Chir. 2000;125: 242-246.
- Lunevicius R, Morkevicius M. Management strategies, early results, benefits, and risk. Factors of laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Worls J Surg 2005; 29: 1299-310
- Lee FY, Leung KL, Lai BS, Ng SS, Dexter S, Lau WY. Predicting mortality and morbidity of patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcer. Arch Surg 2001; 136: 90-4
- Siu WT, Leong HT, Law BK, Chau CH, Li AC, Fung KH et al. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2002; 235: 313-9
- Kum CK, Fernandes ML, Goh P. Comparison between laparoscopic and conventional omental patch repair for perforated duodenal ulcer. Surg Endosc. 1996; 10:1060-1063
- Bertleff MJ, Halm JA, Bemelman WA et al: Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of the perforated peptic ulcer: the LAMA Trial. World J Surg 2009;33:1368-73.
- Cougard P., Barret C., Cadière G.B. et La Société Française de Chirurgie Laparoscopique (SFCL). Le traitement laparoscopique de l'ulcère duodenal perforé. Résultats d'une etude retrospective multicentrique. Annal de chirurgie. 2000; 125: 726-731
- Siu WT, Chau CH, Law BK, Tang CN, Ha PY, Li MK. Routine use of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 481-4
- Lagoo R, Ross L, Mc Mahon RL, et al. The sixth decision regarding perforated duodenal ulcer. JSLS 2002; 6: 359-368